So confession to make: As much as I hate it, I am right on the cusp of the generation known as "millennials." I can't stand the term, and I can't stand identification with a generation perceived by my elders and betters as completely lacking in respect, bereft of basic communication or social skills, and profound senses of entitlement.
Millennials are here to stay, though, and their attitudes are shaping the world of the workforce for better or worse. They have become such a force for change in the workplace, baffling to many. This generation of "adults" has reached a point where entire seminars are devoted to dealing with millennials in the workplace, and people are buying into it.
LinkedIn, ever the bastion of wonderous content and tripe, recently posted an "Open Letter From Millennials" to those in management positions. I'd like to take a moment and address said letter, point by point. I figure it's the good I can do humanity since I'm not Italian and can't rant about Columbus Day with the panache of a Marc Randazza.
Oh, goodie. Next in line for the position the special snowflake had, HR?
It's not a question of pointing out your own problems. That's something you can deal with on your own time. If I choose to point out those flaws that cause you to have a black eye with other generations, it's an attempt to help you improve yourself. That's something many of us with rational thought patterns call "attempts at self-improvement" or "constructive criticism."
No. No, we really don't need you. Talk to me about energy when you actually come into the office not hung over from one of your late nights at the bar or club. And your five dollar macchiato habit is part of the spending problem you refuse to acknowledge. You can buy a $5 bag of Kona Coffee at Food City and brew your own all day long.
Oh look, it wants to speak for its entire generation based on personal experiences and anecdotal evidence. Again, where was that thing we talked about called "constructive criticism?" Maybe the next lesson needs to be about a word called "humility." Anyway, this is YOUR influencer article, so do tell.
hat "Donna Do-Nothing" you're talking about may be one of the most indispensable employees we have, and has proven herself far more times than you have. Just because you're busting your ass on a project doesn't mean that others aren't as well or aren't working on projects with equal or greater importance than yours. And poor performers may have a chilling effect on people, so feel free to stop bitching about other employees' turnout and focus on your own.
If this "Fact" nonsense is going to be a large part of what you ramble on about, let me give you a FACT. The purpose of a business is to make money and be profitable. If you have a product that you're selling, you need to make sure that you're doing stuff that will sell the product so everyone makes money and the business is more profitable. Making a difference can come after we've managed to pay the light bill for the month and can show our investors the money they put into what we do is worth it. Your noble aspirations are nice, but making a difference for people won't mean much if you're not getting the paycheck. And if you made more money bartending in college, go back. Make sure you didn't burn any bridges when you left, though.
Where in the blue hell did you find an office that gives you free Panera and foosball tables in the break room? Nevermind that, though. If you're more concerned about purpose, we'll take the Panera and the foosball tables away. That'll help our bottom line, and you'll get to focus on your purpose.
Welcome to the working world, peaches. Whether you like this or not, I'm going to give you a very important life lesson here: Thanks to all the demands for "equality" your generation made, you ARE a number whether you like it or not. You see, us boss types look at all employees, even that "Donna Do-Nothing" you keep complaining about, as either assets or liabilities. The more you do to prove yourself, and gain our trust and respect, the more you'll be seen as an asset. That's when we call our relationship "personal." You stay a liability by treating the job like a rent payment, counting down until Friday at 5, and then decide to leave later? Fortunately, there's more of you (and others not of your allegedly "essential" generation) where you came from in the application file.
How nice of you to fill up most of this tripe dressing yourself up and me down, then closing out with some suggested "advice." But go on.
Harsh truth: You were raised to believe you could change the world by parents who gave you everything you ever needed and wanted, told you that you were the best thing since sliced bread, and made sure your "participation" trophies were nicely polished and arranged on your shelf as soon as you brought them home. Harsh truth part two: the work you're doing right now is "grunt work" because you haven't proven yourself worthy yet for the bigger tasks with the chance to give you that "purpose" you so desperately crave. Prove yourself consistent with getting my coffee and making sure the plants in my office have water, and I'll give you the tasks that give you the chance to showcase your purpose later when I know I can trust you with the small stuff.
And the whole bit about you getting me a new Mercedes and helping our bottom line? Yeah, that's kind of why you have a job in the first place. See the whole "Asset and Liability" discussion above if you still haven't grasped that concept.
In the light of yet another tragic shooting, this time in Oregon, people are sounding off about the unending national debate on guns and gun control in America. The reactions are typical, ranging from the "we have a second amendment that allows people to keep firearms" to the hysterical responses from people trumpeting former Supreme Court Justice Stevens' suggestion we amend the second amendment to redefine "militias" and services in them, the "give people more mental health options," and even now "We need a gun free society. Just take all the guns."
Shrouded in all of this is the fact that the Second Amendment--a long favored part of the Bill of Rights for conservatives, and a bane of liberal thought--is a thing that is part of our Constitution and we need to respect that. Fortunately, my Fault Lines colleague and editor Scott Greenfield steps in with one of his reasoned, curmudgeonly respectable responses to this issue.
I'll ask all of you to please go read the whole thing, as Simple Justice is a great morning coffee stop for edification and illumination in the world of the law, but I do want to pull one quote that particularly resonated with me.
And that's the central issue that I had problems externalizing this entire time. Whether we love them or hate them, we need to respect the fact that the Constitution, and all of its parts that are onerous to our respective feelings and imagination, is the supreme law of the land. There are mechanisms for changing the parts that we don't like as a collective whole, but those we don't like, until such time as they are changed, must be respected as the law. If you are a part of the mechanism that demands laws be changed on a carefree whim, then know that when you start complaining about how your rights were violated you were part of the system that made this happen.